Some people still just don’t get it.
The First Amendment does not apply to the rules, regulations and behavioral standards set by a private organization. However, the leftists are still convoluting this reality to forward an agenda, and the rest of society is forced to meekly slink into the corner of facilitated despondency sponsored by the International Olympic Committee, and face the punishment of being chained to a ranting Robert De Niro, who is incapable of originating a coherent sentence, except for an obscure selection of trivial dialogue from Cape Fear, and proceeds to bracket the cinematic fluff with a grating guttural loop of f-bombs worthy of a trance sample pack meticulously spliced into an uplifting acid reverberating remix of the enigmatic musical score to Rainman. Someone just ordered eight Touchdowns (vodka and Redbull) just north of 4am in a gritty warehouse straddling the urban core of Bonn, as the shimmering translucent air of hopes and dreams infused in bubble addled gravity defying bass, grapple with the pending dawn and the essence of coffee and cigarette stagnation signifying a new day.
The Uber hierarchy of numbers is simple when applied to the Warhol standards of the Village. One is passe, and two better damn be risque, when embracing publicity and performance arts. Unfortunately, the stringent directives manifested by the Port Authority of trending society and the complex layers of esoteric nuances, were temporarily disbanded, as not a boring single occupant, but a vile pair of Uber riders, threw a wrench into the space-time continuum with their attempt at a post modern critique of an industrialized society propelled by instant gratification, reports a very biased New York Daily News.
The facts of the stark narrative are quite simple, Alex and Emma hail an Uber to transport them to an establishment, after attending an early afternoon birthday party in Manhattan, where they no doubt consumed copious amounts of intoxicants in both pill and liquid form. During the ride to the pub, the pair of pals in a state well beyond the bounds of tipsy, engage in raunchy and disorderly behavior reaching an intolerable culmination at which point the driver pulls over and gives them the boot. In the aftermath of the incident, of course the women played the sexual preference card and claimed that they were asked to leave the car for a simple kiss and throw personal accountability completely out the of window, all while shouting and throwing the label of homophobic, squarely at the Uber contractor. This is the exact core principle of the extremist playbook, behave in a disgusting and unacceptable manner by sniffing your partner’s armpits and kicking the driver’s seat, and when called out for the indiscretions and after facing the reasonable consequences, deploy the victim mentality complete with a sad violin. (It also helps to have a slanted news organization obviously siding with one party.) For the two millennials, this is exactly how things turned out, and society takes another step forward to the new stone(r) age of stupidity and vapidness. Gay, straight, poly, whatever, if acting in a disruptive manner, the cab driver has the authority to terminate the fare at any moment. Sexual preference is not the core issue.
While the news outlet mentions the sterling professional record of the Uber drive in sporting a sparkling ledger of positive reviews on the Uber app, the tone of the article does not just hint, but yells from the top of the Empire State Building, that people in New York City should avoid his car in the future. This is clearly a hit piece which calls into question the integrity of the reporter and the editor, and displays illustrates the hypocrisy and intolerance of an entire political ideology. In Seattle activists for the homeless industrial complex engage in “doxxing” or sharing personal information, which includes names, addresses, images and contacts about political adversaries via social networking, and now an entire news site is basically engaged in the same vein of shady tactics in calling for residents to boycott the business venture of an individual. With the media choosing to broadcast an aggressive bias, what arduous legal pathway does the future hold for the right of business to refuse service? This goes well beyond the status of baked goods at a homosexual wedding.
The biting irony and caveat to this messy circus of social engineering, is that the driver is probably Muslim, and one of the two passenger’s mentions that their behavior most likely offended him.
Aren’t leftists in the style of Merkel supposed to be embracing followers of Islam while donning burqas and attacking Christianity? Only when it’s convenient.
Have another drink ladies.
Read the New York Daily News story here.
