A lifelong body of hard work and determination leading to a dream acceptance to one of the reputed elite educational institutions in the world was derailed in stark and incorrigible fashion, as a Harvard student fell victim to the contemporary resounding ideology of gun control advocates proliferating a toxic narrative bent on compromising fundamental individual rights.
As campus carry has been a hot button issue of debate in the campaign to terminate the startling ramifications of the dubious “Gun Free Zone”, apparently the strict policy of campus are spilling into the surrounding community and attempting to engulf any party affiliated with the historic Ivy League institution, an irony that is lost on the pseudo-intellectuals and the reality of the Boston location, which absolutely had zero relevance in context to the American Revolution.
Multiple news outlets report that plight of coed Leyla Pirnie is on course for a date with the higher courts, as her roommates allegedly compromised her privacy and dignity by inexplicably searching her room, where upon they magically stumbled upon her firearm. Her fellow occupants in the domicile then proceeded to contact the landlord, who contacted police, and discovery was set in motion and ultimately determined that Pirnie is a lawful gun owner. In the immediate aftermath of the bizarre and politically motivated set of events, she is now fighting to keep her residence, as the roommates have requested that she move out, a wish that the overzealous property owner is willing to grant. As the academic year is winding down for a temporary halt and the holidays, the cruel timing of the illegal search and subsequent unsavory actions are magnified in what is sure to be a feverish orgiastic celebration of legalism on all sides featuring a plethora of lawyers, and the crucial interpretations of judges in ensuring that this situation is properly rectified. A finality that certain groups, featuring a high proportion of the Harvard brass and faculty hope that is buried in a steaming visceral pile of confusion and contrarian inclinations.
As lacking respect for fellow citizens and breaking minor laws for the sake of activism are two crucial components of the Leftist playbook in attempting to banish traditional values and orchestration an aggressive culture control, the inconceivable and intolerable acts of the roommates are not surprising considering the three decade paradigm shift of the college campus, from institutions of higher learning, to institutions worthy of the wit and brilliance of Ken Kesey. “Yes professor, the bubblegum on the bedpost loses its flavor overnight, and the Constitution does not stipulate that a “safe space” support group morphing into vigilante status, cannot “out” and “shame” a college student from legally owning a firearms in an off-campus apartment.” The entire unpalatable mutant tree flow chart tracking the decision of decision making skills of the roommates defies logic. But there is more to the story, if the aforementioned sordid details are not enough to create multiple Twitter bot accounts using Python, to spare friends and family from the frustrating and tedious experienced in attempting to process this minor travesty.
What prompted the egregious, unjustified, and humiliating search of Pirnie’s personal quarters was a MAGA hat, and the ingrained stigma and disdain which residents of urban areas have for folks in the heartland of the nation and the deep south. They should probably thanking her for injecting an environment of sensibility into the commonwealth of Massachusetts, and the damaging legacy of Dukakis and the Big Dig. Again, the city versus country battle ensues, and this time it involves a capable graduate student at one of the most prodigious educational alcoves being served to the insatiable jackals prompting emotion and not reason, embracing contrived DIY mechanisms beckoning equality, when in fact the attempts to engineer society are a lame attempt to serve special interests and dissolve the progressive free market tenets of Capitalism.
The roommates claim that the existence of firearms in the controlled kumbaya environment of the modern educational nightmare prompt an “uncomfortable” feeling. These are the same people who claim that all strong-willed white males are rapists, and eye contact between the sexes should be eliminated, hence the fervid breeding ground of microaggressions oozing from the bravado of masculinity. While metered insanity is no laughing matter, the hypocrisy of the belief that firearms are okay, “only when they save my precious life from the boogie man of malcontent”, persists on both sides of the ivy covered wall. Clearly, with the Marxist tendencies swimming in the precarious shark infested waters of the dedicated fountains of academia, were the walls built around campus built to keep people in or out? Blazers with unrequired patches placed strategically on the sleeves are proven health hazards, especially for the person wearing them when attempting to get a drink at the local pub.
While the ebb and flow of the micro news cycle captures the collective attention of the nation in furnishing Pirnie with a fleeting digital moment of fame, the pundits on both sides of the issue of self-defense wait in heightened anticipation for the legal channels to be fully deployed, as the quasi-debate rages on. Except for the fact that exists no desire for conversation from factions of the gun control movement, as the reasonable expectations of firearms owners across the nation will never be acceptable to the future rulers of gulags and administrators of 5 minutes of hate. The situation just proves how the threshold towards cumbersome policy has taken a turn in the wrong direction and festered under the tutelage of megalomaniacs and intellectual bullies.