Professor Mann beguiles a crowd at a TED talk in executing an apocalyptic narrative, allegedly based on subjective research findings.
Headlined by blathering celebrities and pharmaceutical industry protesters send on a mission by Mother Gaea, the anti-MMR vaccine movement swept through the coastal US like an unbridled swarm of false positives creating a future nightmare of public health emergencies. And it was all based on junk science, as researchers in Norway and Sweden concluded that a child receiving a shot of resistance against measles, mumps and rubella, was not suddenly vulnerable to the plight of autism.
Even though that health care officials and professionals strongly support vaccinations based on hard data that shows the benefits to a healthy society, and the researcher of the felonious study was rebuked, debunked and discredited on all levels of existence, certain parents are choosing to forego the booster shots and expose the public to disease outbreaks that should never occur in an industrialized nation. The moral of the story, junk science snugly fits the hand of an agenda, unlike the glove of a murderous hall of fame running back, and folks still have not learned their lesson in blindly following the idiosyncrasies of Jim Carey and the insufferable aging pin-up that is Jenny McCarthy.
Echoing the playbook of intellectual dishonesty fueling the core of the environmentalist green industry movement eliciting fear and hysteria throughout society while amassing billions of dollars, researcher Michael Mann finally endured a brutal and inevitable collision with karma. Mann, who is dubiously famous for his 1998 paper showing an exponential jump in global temperatures shaped like a hockey stick, lost a long and drawn out legal battle and claims of defamation towards a scientific colleague responding to the outlandish conclusions presented by the research.
Incomplete and misleading, the graph is apparently an illustration of ego and agenda detrimentally augmenting perceived reality.
The Canadian Supreme court dismissed the case, partly because Mann refused to reveal his complete data set supporting the ridiculous hypothesis that would cause Wayne Gretzky night terrors consisting of jagged demonic hockey sticks gradually consuming the essence of the soul. The ruling was so emphatic, reports WND, that the climate alarmist was ordered to pay the entire legal tab spanning from the trial’s inception in 2011. Apparently, the Penn State professor and will appeal the monetary sanctions.
As the hockey stick scenario is readily used for propaganda and rhetoric, and originating from global organizations to polarizing individuals alike in promoting suffocating ideology rather than productive debate, the aversion of Mann to transparency is certainly a victory for skeptics and reasonable persons, but will unfortunately have limited influence on slowing down the carbon footprint witch trials. The United Nations chose to feature the the findings in the 2001 climate report. This sobering and disappointing reality is already evident, as none of the major news syndicates at the time of publishing this editorial (with “news” as the loosest of loose definitions in embracing truth), including the surprising omission within the Fox News empire, have produced at least a skeleton write-up profiling the resounding insanity of relevant group think.
While the inability to produce data that would most likely contradict a flimsy belief system regarding the contemporary, historical and future cyclical nuances of human influence on the climate is extremely telling, the repercussions of a burgeoning farce will not equate to a full-scale reboot of the proactive brainwashing campaign plaguing Western society. The nature of the earth has outlasted individualism for eternity, and the sustainability of the planet cannot be based on shallow sleuthing which hinges on the hope that somehow the collective processing power of the entire global computer system can model the innumerable variables formulating reality, and irony is not lost on the fact that the complex hardware framework demands a ceaseless power source, and putting a strain on the entire energy grid. This consequence of hardcore innovation is never mentioned in polite and public conversation as the conflict of interest in achieving the status of a god is looked upon as a noble pursuit, though the prospects for success exist at the absolute threshold of zero.
Mann and associates continue the assault on integrity and critical thinking skills in pawning off radicalism and sensationalism to forward an agenda of control based off of fear, and is not conducive to a prosperous future of productivity. The overwhelmingly mind boggling history of the climate spanning billions of years is not an entity that translates to limited data sets and the thoughts of dreams of an individual striving for short-term solutions, but is meant for the imaginations and reflection of the concerned masses providing viable and sensible stewardship for the future of the planet in understanding the reality of a globe hosting diverse examples of sociopolitical differences.
True to form, if one disagrees with the premise of global cooling morphing into global warming and ultimately climate change thanks to the industrialization of humanity, the term “climate denier” is carelessly tossed around in staunching any productive dialogue of differing perspectives between individuals. Facts and evidence are replaced by a stagnant limited two color tone of black or white and represented by the nasally whiny proclamation, “You are either with us or against us!” It’s impossible to argue in the presence of Oppositional defiant disorder, especially if it is intertwined with a certain political philosophy.
Read the WND story here.
This editorial made possible by Duckduckgo.com