The definition of liberty for e-liberals is muddled by emotional elements and petty name-calling in vilifying law abiding citizens and gun owners with a schizophrenic approach and failure to discern reality from fiction.
Under the brazen pretense of hypocrisy, even though the indelible leftists will claim hyperbole in lacking any semblance of accountability or intellectual dishonesty through pathetic attempt to win the internet, the radicals somehow embrace the proliferation of firearms to Ukraine citizens. In a game that two can play at utilizing the perfect memory of social media, the following reprehensible and vacuous tweet illustrates just how vapid and intellectually challenged militant activists are in discounting constitutional freedoms, only to use them when they support a specific agenda.
Twitter screenshot of the obvious logical fallacies of a group that only recognizes basic liberties when it helps their argument.
Multiple Second Amendment supporters have posted the indictment of a screenshot on the Twittersphere to indicate just how fickle the Occupy group is in warping truth and catering to the fleeting attention span of reactionaries lacking suitable critical thinking skills.
During a heated interaction between end-users, a gun rights advocate made a comment somewhere along the lines of “I didn’t know Democrats liked guns”, whereas a respondent fired back with a statement that epitomizes the lack of reason within the counterculture movement, “Citizens should not be allowed to possess firearms”. Of course, the thread has gone bonkers as extremists try to employ “mental gymnastics” to morph their responses in not actually addressing the issue or answering a question, as Jack Dorsey’s domain is conducive to deflection and circumventing facts.
Warning- Clicking on the following post will undoubtedly destroy a significant amount of brain cells in compromising the synapses as a defense mechanism to such blatant and preposterous blabbering illogical platitudes. Occupy Democrat conditional pro-gun thread
Ripping a page from Joe Biden’s playbook in exploiting a tragedy to forward a narrative, account holders on the liberal Twitter group’s wall are regularly displaying cognitive dissonance and a mind numbing obstinance in attempting to separate gun rights during a crises. The benefits of armed civilians possessing firearms for hunting and self-defense are replaced by name calling and the despicable attempt to discredit law-abiding citizens. In a proportional progression of perpetual group think, the corporate press has taken a 180 degree turn on their usual caustic rhetoric towards the Second Amendment, as every major “news” outlet is framing the Ukrainian government proclaiming martial law has an uplifting pious development. In clearly selling the good versus evil card in pitting fragile Democracy against Trump buddy Putin, the gloves are clearly off in once again beckoning propaganda in order to elicit control over others.
While Twitter and the other social media site of note have checkered pasts when it comes to the percolation of misinformation, the epidemic of poli-bots spreading lies, and a major procedural distaste for content that leans to the right of center, it as this crucial juncture that viable moderation efforts are needed. However, with the abundance of disruptive sites on both sides of the ledger inhabiting the fringe of the polarizing environment, the ambiguous terms and conditions clauses are being utilized to hinder a diversity of opinions and spawning a stagnation of perspectives. As publicly-traded private entities, both major social networks can pick and choose how their realms are managed and who is silenced, but end-users are under the false pretense that typing a message is akin to speaking on a street corner, and the resulting confusion only widens the chasm dividing political allegiances.
The Ukraine has some of the most permissive gun policy on the planet, yet uniformed sentimentalists choose to exercise their rights to be oblivious in taking the firearms debate to a weird and zany place that is not contextually linear with either fact and reality. The two critical concepts are generally ignored by want to be societal engineers striving for power.