In a world overrun with affirmative action and ruled by politically correct thought police, simply stating a fact can earn harsh retort in addition to perpetual harassment and shaming from the blatantly biased digital nodes of the social networks, and finally the end to successful career. As quickly as it takes for the brain’s neurons to formulate a double digit word thought that does not comply to the incessant and toxic groupthink plaguing the evolution of society, the game is over before it even begins.
Men are quickly finding out that blatant and ceaseless intolerance has somehow forced its way into the rarefied air of PHD driven hardcore scientific research, a disturbing development that considerably ups the ante from the typical vigilante injustice and cruel fate facing members of the media, politicians, corporate leaders, and public figures. Apparently CERN of all places is just not an innovative working laboratory studying the super colliding properties of particles, but now a tainted example of feminism savagely crashing into reason, as the visceral thoroughly assassinates logic, and debate is left running with its tails between its legs as the tense mentality of The View furrows their formative brows.
Scientist Alessandro Strumia made the fateful decision to speak candidly last year on the no win if you are a male hot button of the state of women in STEM careers, and recently suffered grave consequences as result, reports the BBC. As the majority of the remarks on the controversial matter made sense given the numbers and proportions, extremism in society has traveled across the empty expanses of light years to the left and an impossible quandary of a quantum singularity has evolved, incapable of compromise or an open mind. Unfortunately for the esteemed doctor, this marks the beginning of a despicable and arduous process including ceaseless castigation and online attacks, that ironically and literally, waste time and energy, as each reckless and hate-filled post, Tweet, or message, fired from a device, requires a proportional amount of electricity, as does the subsequent perfect memory storage ledger of server space that rigorously preserves history. The tech realm, or techoprisy, chooses not to acknowledge the laws of thermodynamics, especially with billions invested in the Green movement.
The research facility, located in Switzerland, opted to terminate Strumia’s teaching position without affording him the opportunity to defend his talking points, protocol that is typically followed in the wake of complaints being filed against the perspective of a faculty member. In educating a captive audience that the system being skewed is probably not the best thing for the entire discipline of science, the ideological gallows were swiftly unleashed. Maybe he was experimenting with a gateway to send feminists directly to a habitable planet 200 light years away. As the new world order of contemporary research and academia promotes an environment of ingenuity and free thought in self-serving fashion, the sanctions inflicted by the institution towards the scientist are indicative of a burgeoning hypocrisy propagating indoctrination instead of embracing original thought.
A similar deplorable controversy emerged in the Seattle area last year, as a male computer science lecturer at the University of Washington penned a piece exploring the gender demographics of the tech industry. As with Strumia, Stuart Reges made the mistake of applying actual data and facts to support the argument that the majority of women are simply not interested in working STEM fields, prompting an ugly and needless backlash. Reges was rebutting an absolutely ridiculous premise by a fellow colleague that suggested by softening the actual interior design of tech office spaces with candles and art, more females would be inclined to join the coding ranks.
Completely lost in this maelstrom of insanity is that women and men are different and blessed with a unique set of qualities and attributes based on genetics, chemistry and biology. As the countercultural movements incessantly bombard the research and tech industries with cries of inequality, and fail to acknowledge basic human nature, the entire frameworks suffers as quality of work is substituted for detrimental policy. No enlightened individual is suggesting that women, who have carved successful and legendary careers in STEM fields are not equal to their male counterparts and in many instances are more competent. Frustratingly, anyone who suggests that the proportions are dictated by nature is stigmatized and labeled as a misogynist, even if that individual that embraces and understands that Ada Lovelace was the chief architect and thinker responsible for the modern computer.
The caveat to this crazy narrative is a simple oversight by the extremists in outing their devious agenda. As women dominate the teaching profession with nearly a four to one ratio, why is there a complete absence of consternation and vitriol exposing this nightmarish abomination of discrimination? See, it seems silly and outlandish if the tables are turned. But women are allowed to adhere to a positive label which pertains to a job title as the majority, while men can only exist as harsh tyrants in carrying an industry.
Quite possibly, men possess an overwhelming aversion to nurturing young people, and humans in general tend to resonate with the careers of their choice, and not with a job forced onto them by the societal pressures facilitated by a dangerous agenda.
Read the BBC story here.